Implementation and outcome evaluation of the medical education partnership initiative biostatistical reasoning workshops for faculty and postgraduate students at the university of kwazulu-natal; durban; south africa

Background. There is a shortage of biostatistics expertise at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN); Durban; South Africa and in the African region. This constrains the ability to carry out high-quality health research in the region.Objectives. To quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate a programme designed to improve the conceptual and critical understanding of bio statistical concepts of UKZN health researchers.Methods. A 40-hour workshop in biostatistical reasoning was conducted annually between 2012 and 2015. The workshops were structured around interpretation and critical assessment of nine articles from the medical literature; with a mix of in-class sessions and small group discussions. Quantitative evaluation of the knowledge gained from the workshops was carried out using a pre- and post-workshop quiz; and qualitative evaluation of the workshop process was done using a mid-workshop questionnaire and focus group discussions.Results. For each year that the workshop was conducted; post-workshop quiz scores were significantly higher than pre-workshop scores. When quiz assessments from all 4 years of training were combined; the pretest median score was 55% (interquartile range (IQR) 40 - 62%) and the post-test median score was 68% (IQR 62 - 76%); with p0.0001 for the overall comparison of pre- v. post-scores. There was a general consensus among participants that the workshop improved their reasoning skills in biostatistics. Participants also recognised the value of the workshop in building biostatical capacity at UKZN. Conclusion. The workshops were well received and improved the critical and conceptual understanding of the participants. This education mode offers the opportunity for health researchers to advance their knowledge in settings where there are few professional biostatistician collaborators

Predictors of site choice and eventual learning experiences in a decentralised training programme designed to prepare medical students for careers in underserved areas in south Africa

Background. There is a dire need for medical schools in South Africa to train medical doctors who have the capacity and willingness to work in primary healthcare facilities; particularly in rural areas. Objectives. To assess the effect of students' gender; race; place of birth and place of high school completion on their choice of training site location and to assess the extent to which the training programme enhanced students' learning experiences relevant to primary care across training sites. Methods. A survey design involving six cohorts of 4th-year undergraduate medical students (N=187) who were part of the 2013 Family Medicine rotation at the Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine. Self-administered questionnaires were completed by students at the end of each rotation. Data analyses involved descriptive computations and inferential statistical tests; including non-parametric tests for group comparison and generalised polynomial logistic regression. Results. Students believed that their knowledge and skills relevant to primary care increased after the rotation (p0.0001). There were statistically significant differences between rural and urban sites on certain measures of perceived programme effectiveness. Male students were less likely to choose urban sites. Black students were less likely to choose rural sites compared with their white and Indian counterparts; as were students who attended rural high schools (odds ratio (OR) 9.3; p0.001). Students from a rural upbringing were also less likely to choose rural sites (OR 14; p0.001). Conclusion. Based on the findings; an objective approach for student allocation that considers students' background and individual-level characteristics is recommended to maximise learning experiences